Suppose a compliance platform costs $12,000 per year. Does that sound pricey?
It’s all about what you are replacing.
Automating the gathering of evidence across a complex technology environment can eliminate hundreds of hours of tedious work, it could be a wise investment. If a startup with seven employees could have the same proof manually, in a couple of hours every month, the total looks considerably different.
This is a good way to locate Vanta alternatives. Don’t start with asking which platform has the greatest features. Ask how much time and effort those features will save your company.
Automation Can be a Break-Even Economic Factor
It’s not necessarily either good or bad. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a growing technology company that has hundreds of employees numerous cloud environments, numerous applications, and regular access changes. The manual process of collecting evidence can be a major operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence are able to justify their cost.
Now consider a 10-person startup preparing for its first SOC 2. Consider a startup with 10 employees preparing for its first SOC 2.
This is a crucial distinction when evaluating Vanta’s pricing. The capabilities of a modern platform are impressive, however they can only be of value for organizations that require them.
Compare Architecture with Brands, not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to examine the features, services and contracts offered by each platform. Both are established compliance platforms that focus on integrations and automation.
You’ll need to decide on something else first. Do you want to use a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Certain businesses would prefer automated evidence collection and constant monitoring. Some companies prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the exact same guidelines.
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete within an identical category that is focused on automation. There are also platforms with a lighter design that focus more on the system’s organization, rather and connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the second group. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central work area, gives editable policies and evidence guidelines, and allows auditors to review evidence submitted by gaining the use of read-only access.
It is deliberately not connected to operating systems, nor create infrastructure agents. Customers can upload evidence that they prefer.
Be aware of the system’s access.
The elimination of integrations is not without its limitations: one must manually gather evidence.
This is a way to eliminate the need to integrate, and the process of compliance does not require any connection to the operational environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. Which tradeoff is right for your business?
CertAssist is geared towards teams comprising between five and 200 persons. The company publishes its pricing instead of requiring an initial sales call to determine the price at which to start. Its stated launch price is $225 per month, which is compared to a standard price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today may not be the same at 500 or 100 employees.
While compliance is straightforward A lightweight platform could be a good idea. As the number of employees, systems, frameworks, and requirements for evidence expand, the economics may ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity take its place when buying compliance technologies.
Affording fifty integrations because they look good in a table of comparisons is not a good idea. Spend money on them only when the manual work they replace becomes more costly.